The right context
The qualification and subject matter. Marking rules are not identical across every syllabus.
NeuraGeek uses AI marking as revision feedback. It can help you spot missing points and improve an answer, but it does not replace an examiner or an official result.
Physics, 3 marks
Explain why a seat belt makes a passenger less likely to be injured when a car stops.
Student answer
The belt stops the passenger moving forward and makes the force smaller.
AI feedback
2 / 3The belt stops forward motion.
The force is reduced.
Add the reason: the belt increases stopping time, which reduces deceleration and force.
This example explains the interface. It is not an official Cambridge question or mark.
The selected qualification, subject and question provide the starting point.
The system looks for the ideas, working or explanation expected in the answer.
You see an estimated mark and the part of the answer that needs more work.
Use judgement
Get a second opinion when the answer is important, surprising or difficult to judge.
A long essay or evaluation where more than one argument could be valid
A mark that looks much higher or lower than you expected
An unclear image, difficult handwriting or incomplete question context
Feedback that conflicts with your current syllabus or teacher guidance
The qualification and subject matter. Marking rules are not identical across every syllabus.
A helpful review shows what earned credit, what is missing and what to improve.
Long answers, unclear images and questions that rely on judgement need a more careful review.
The system and the syllabus both change, so marking quality has to be tested again over time.
Try the marker with an answer you have already written. Use the feedback to improve it, then check anything uncertain with a teacher or the official material.